On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:16:55PM -0400, Joseph S wrote:
> I thought the performance penalty came from making the executable 
> bigger, which means the executor has to skip over the debug symbols 
> somehow, which eats up cpu.  If the symbols are in a different file this 
> wouldn't apply.

When running the executable is mmaped into memory. So any extra data in
the executable has absolutly zero effect.

> Well I don't really know how debug symbols work.  It seems that maybe 
> all the debug info is is the source files with some mappling info then 
> maybe it might.

No, the info is in the debug info (gdb can't be expected to understand
the source of every language you might want to debug).

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to 
> litigate.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to