Jorge Godoy wrote:
> "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> ------- Original Message -------
>>> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: 15/03/07, 23:51:18
>>> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall and version confusion
>>>
>>> If you want that, create a wrapper program that calls to different
>>> statically compiled versions of pg_dump.
>> I can't even begin to imagine how difficult that would be on Windows!
>
> As difficult as a new ".bat" file?
>
Thats the easy bit. The difficult bit is building the statically linked
utilities with ssl, gettext and kerberos support. We found when porting
PostgreSQL in the first place that for many of the supporting libraries,
Windows is an afterthought and where on unix there might be static and
dynamic builds, on Windows once dynamic is done, static doesn't matter.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
