"Reuven M. Lerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, everyone. I've been using PostgreSQL for a decade, and it hasn't
> failed me yet. But I've been having some serious performance problems
> on a database that I've been using in my grad-school research group, and
> it's clear that I need help from some more experienced hands.
What PG version are you using?
> In theory, this would be the way to go. In practice, every step has
> become a performance nightmare, taking many more hours than I might have
> hoped or expected. For example, I've got a Pl/PgSQL function that goes
> through each variable-assignment row, and UPDATEs is previous_value
> column with whatever the previous value might have been.
I'd try to think of a way to eliminate the function altogether in favor
of a single UPDATE command. In general, row-at-a-time thinking isn't
the way to win in SQL.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
