"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2/19/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> #  select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) < 0;
>>> ?column?
>>> ----------
>>> f  <-- looks busted to me
>>> (1 row)
>> 
>> If you'd casted to timestamptz then I'd agree this is busted.
>> As-is, it might have something to do with your timezone setting,
>> which you didn't mention?

> show timezone reports us/eastern in both cases.

Oooohhh ... it's not timezone, it's locale.  EXPLAIN, when used
correctly, shows how the system is interpreting this, and it's
not what you think:

regression=# explain select 1 where ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - 
now()) < 0;
                                                                QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.02..0.03 rows=1 width=0)
   One-Time Filter: ((((((now() - '1 day'::interval))::timestamp without time 
zone)::timestamp with time zone - now()))::text < '0'::text)
(2 rows)

Still another demonstration of why implicit casts to text are evil :-(
Try putting the '0' in quotes.  (And drop the useless explicit cast
to timestamp while you're at it.)

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org/

Reply via email to