> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 29/01/07, 21:12:30
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQLbranches
>
> I am pretty amazed people are considering shortening the release cycle
> for our most popular platform. As it is a packaging issue, if some
> people don't want to continue providing updates, I can start asking in
> the community for someone else to do it.
>
> If the port is broken, and people must upgrade, I can see the reason for
> not releasing updates, but if it is a question of time committment, I
> oppose such cutbacks.
It's not a question of having the time - it's partly what I'm paid for these
days. It's a question of whether that time is being wasted maintaining old
versions that perhaps people aren't concerned with any more. That's why I
brought the subject up on this -general thread, rather than in -hackers.
A couple of thoughts spring to mind that might warrant some consideration:
- Windows is our most popular platform for sure, but I would wager the majority
of those installations are development/test installs and that possibly Linux is
the most popular platform for production systems. Those dev
systems are likely to be running the latest version.
- So far I think you are the only person to object to 8.0 being dropped!
In any case, if people want to keep 8.0, then I will keep building it for the
time being. We might need to start staggering point releases though.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
