Shashank Tripathi wrote:
>> It's a valid discussion here (although better on -advocacy), because
>> it helps
>> me have the right facts to present to clients about whether they
>> should stay
>> with a legacy database in MySQL vs upgrading to a modern PostgreSQL.
>
>
> For all its flaws, MySQL is catching on quick and has a very active
> community of developments that several of us find rather handy -
> http://forge.mysql.com/
>
> Is there something similar for Pgsql? (Disclaimer: new to this group
> because I'm unimpressed with MySQL beyond 30 million rows in a table
> that require advanced subqueries).
www.pgfoundry.org
>
> Shanx
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
