On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 11:47 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 10:23, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 11/22/06 20:23, carter ck wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am wonderring if it is a good practice to use SERIAL index as primary
> > > key, as it is only available up to 9999999?
> > >
> > > Currently i am dealing with storing LDAP users into Postgres and i am
> > > looking for a better way to make use of the DN as primary key instead of
> > > SERIAL index.'
Bigserial?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
