Alexander Staubo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See below. Seems 18204 is waiting for a process that is "idle in  
> transaction"; makes me wish that PostgreSQL could export more  
> information about the age of in-progress transactions. I am turning  
> on logging so I can determine what a future hanging process is doing.

Yeah, it looks like PIDs 18202 and 18207 are the bottlenecks, and they
are not waiting on locks.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to