Matt Miller wrote: > I'd like SYSDATE to work syntactically and semantically the same as > CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (or CURRENT_TIME, or whatever). I can create a > function called "sysdate" that does the trick, but then it seems I have > to reference the function as "sysdate ()," but I want to be able to get > away with just "sysdate." It seems that CURRENT_TIMESTAMP and their > friends are magic functions that can be referenced without an explicit > empty argument list.
current_time and the like are hardcoded in the grammar. You'd have to do the same for sysdate. It's not hard, but then I'd question the hassle of having to patch all the Postgres installations you're going to want to run your code on. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
