> > > I can deal with materializing the resultset, but I want
> to get away
> > > from the loop-a-thousand-times-doing-plus-one...
> >
> > i dont think its possible. note that you can make a
> refcursor inside
> > your plpgsql function and pass it to an sql function which
> can do sql
> > cursor operations on it -- i think :-)..haven't tried it yet.
> >
> > merlin
>
> ...If you know your application well enough, you might get
> away with doing a select count() with the same where clause
> just before entering the cursor. It _could_ of course be
> wrong, though! OTOH, it would be much faster. If the only
> down-side is occasionally giving users an incorrect count,
> then perhaps call it a "row estimate", and let them marvel at
> how accurate the estimate is most of hte time!
Nope, the query is way too expensive to run it twice. (GIN scan over
well over half a million rows. It's faster to do the
get-as-cursor-then-loop-and-increment, I've measured that)
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
