On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:12 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Tomi NA wrote:
> >>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
> >>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
> >>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
> >>> It is 100% FUD.
> >>>
> >> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
> >> Does anyone know?
> >
> > That implies malice. The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> > believe what they wrote.
>
> I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
> complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.
Actually, after reading the reply from Brandon Aiken, I believe it was
driven by a complete lack of understanding of relational theory.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
