My guess is what this really means is they weren't making money on it. Its a community friendly spin to suggest that community support is so good that not many companies will pony up for commercial support. My guess is that its fairly accurate though. A company is only going to use postgreSQL if their dba is behind it and for that to be the case the dba is probably pretty comfortable with their own knowledge backed by community support. If its not the dba who is promoting pgsql in the company then it is likely an exec who sees it as a way to save money and likely doesn't want to pay for support for a free product.
Joe joe_audette [at] yahoo dotcom http://www.joeaudette.com http://www.mojoportal.com ----- Original Message ---- From: Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2006 2:58:03 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Well, Pervasive is now out.... On 8/3/06, Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100795.html Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-) " ... In a letter to the PostgreSQL community of developers, Pervasive Software President John Farr said last week that the company "underestimated the high level of quality support and expertise already available within the PostgreSQL community." ... " -- Best regards, Nikolay ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
