I'm not sure if my second email made it through; I haven't seen it on the
website yet. But, basically, what I am asking is this:
      -is it true that when looping over query results in a plpgsql
for..in..execute loop, several records are stored in memory at one time?
and if so, then I am wondering:
      -if I then update one of the records currently in memory, are these
changes visible when the loop gets to it?

I hope that someone can tell me these things.
Thanks,
Meghan


                                                                           
             Kenneth Downs                                                 
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                              
                                                                        To 
             07/26/2006 08:50          Jessica M Salmon                    
             AM                        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                
                                                                        cc 
                                       pgsql-general@postgresql.org        
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [GENERAL] loop with circular    
                                       updates                             
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Jessica M Salmon wrote:

>Hi All.
>
>I'm writing a plpgsql function that creates a table and loops over the
>items in that table, using a FOR ... IN EXECUTE ... loop. The thing is, on
>each iteration I update the table over which I am looping. Sometimes, the
>result of this update makes it no longer necessary/desirable to process
>subsequent records in the loop.
>
>
Can you tell us more about the app?  Sounds like an ERP allocation or
something like that.

(See attached file: ken.vcf)

Attachment: ken.vcf
Description: Binary data

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to