On Thursday 06 July 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
> DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
> with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.
I recently speced this exact hardware for a customer. When the customer called
HP to order, HP told them that it is not appropriate for a database. They
cited shorter life of the SATA drives and overall performance.
Is it true? I don't know. I have used SATA enclosures for databases for
sometime and have been quite happy with them.
You may also to look at the ml30 which is SCSI.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Anyone have Experience with this h/w+s/w combo? It will be used as
> a "history server", so sub-second transaction times are not required.
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
