On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 16:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I DO NOT CARE about which rows are deleted.
>
> You can't possibly think that that holds true in general.
I agree that it is not true in the general case, but then I also don't
want to use DELETE with LIMIT in the general case. I only want to use it
in the very specific cases where it makes sense, and it results in
cleaner SQL, and it would likely result in a better execution plan.
> I can tolerate nondeterminism in SELECT because it doesn't change the
> data. If you get it wrong you can always do it over. UPDATE/DELETE
> need to have higher standards though.
Please Tom, there are so many ways you can shoot your feet already in
there... I don't see why this one would be a bigger foot-gun then the
subquery stile. It is functionally equivalent. It's only easier to
write... if somebody wants to shoot himself, he can do it one way or the
other. Placing a big warning on the docs should be enough... <rant>
except if postgres is really targeting the MySql users instead of the
Oracle folks. Those guys already have this foot-gun readily loaded...
where's the American spirit where you are allowed to carry guns and
expected to act responsible ?</rant>
Cheers,
Csaba.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
