Larry Rosenman wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Casey Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> however, when I did "select * from pg_stat_activity" on the pg > >>> server, it showed no connection to that db. Then I looked at the > >>> processes: tmp0% ps ax | grep test_seg1 > >>> 10317 ? D 0:36 postgres: autovacuum process test_seg1 > >> > >> Hmm, autovacuum won't show up in pg_stat_activity because it never > >> calls pgstat_report_activity(). Seems like maybe it should, though.
Yep. I'll fix it. Should I backpatch to 8.1? > > If we do that, would it help people who are trying to determine if > > pg_autovacuum is running? Would the connection still appear while > > pg_autovacuum is sleeping? > > I believe while autovacuum is sleeping, the process is gone. Yes, which means that really autovacuum does not sleep (it just exits when it's done). Postmaster is the one who sleeps between autovac iterations. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
