Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On May 9, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard >> drive capacity that you will get with SATA. > > Does this hold true still under heavy concurrent-write loads? I'm > preparing yet another big DB server and if SATA is a better option, > I'm all (elephant) ears.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a 15kRPM SATA drive. -Doug ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
