> > Looks that way to me. You could try setting enable_sort off as well,
> > which will penalize the seqscan+sort plan another 100million cost units.
> > And maybe try reducing random_page_cost to make the indexscan look
> > cheaper. However, if there's a 100million delta between the two plans,
> > I suspect you really really don't want the indexscan anyway ;-)
>
> I imagine the followup post:
>
> So, I've had this query running for six weeks now, and...
Well, I guess that's it then... I will let the query run with the
seqscan+sort. It will still run 1-2 days, yesterday I stopped it after 6
hours ;-) Actually it would be nice to have some kind of feedback on
what is it doing so I can estimate how long it will still take... cause
I'm not sure the seqscan+sort won't run itself for 6 weeks...
Thanks,
Csaba.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
