Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The other thing that is eating OID's are temporary objects. I personally > consider the implementation of temp tables broken for precisely that > matter. If your application uses temp tables, sooner or later it will > cause an OID counter wrap around and then you run the risk of random > transaction failures due to duplicate key errors on CREATE TEMP TABLE.
Not as of 8.1. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly