Kai Hessing wrote:
>>> What do you mean with larger statistics target?
>>
>> See ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS, or just change default_statistics_target
>> and re-ANALYZE.
>
> Thanks, that definitly looks like a starting point. I will test it and
> post my results. Btw. what happens if the estimation would be to low?
unbelievable... I found the problem: Doing a simple ANALYZE after
resetting the test-db to a previous state is my friend. The results now are:
---------
Index Scan using phon_phon_idx, phon_phon_idx, phon_phon_idx, .....
(cost=0.00..56793.09 rows=4068 width=53) (actual time=0.155..363.810
rows=2534 loops=1)
Index Cond: (((phon)::text = 'xyz'::text) OR .....
Filter: (status > -1)
Total runtime: 11140.480 ms
---------
Thank you very much, this was the right hint!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
