"Eric B. Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 25, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is the sort of detail that you really should not omit.
> I'm now curious if complex rules can influence the planner in
> negative ways.
It's possible. I'm not certain that that is really what you are
seeing, but it could be.
> ... However, I can try to work up a
> test case against 7.4.12 if you think it'll be beneficial.
I doubt we'd consider patching such a problem in 7.4. At this point
the only issues that will get patched in 7.4 are security and data-loss
risks, not performance problems.
Again: demonstrating the issue in 8.1 or CVS HEAD would be a good step
towards getting people motivated to fix it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
