On 14/3/06 20:43, "Wes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/13/06 5:50 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I believe things such as what vendors a government
> entity is using is required by law to be public information.
Maybe in some jurisdictions, but that's not the same as Kevin naming the
vendor in the same message or even thread as he has compared their
perfomance with ours.
Anyway - whilst I'm emailing I'd like to congratulate Kevin on a successful
project, and thank him for telling us about it.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
