"Karl O. Pinc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would have been nice to have an option to SQL's VACUUM that would > ignore the cost-based delays so as to bring that database back > to life as rapidly as possible. (Likewise the vacuumdb shell > command.)
What's wrong with SET?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
