>> >> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from >> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for >> yourself :)
>Why on earth should that be? Citing Baldur Norddahl (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-01/msg00597.php): "I will also point out that none of the replication solutions have the same solid reputation as postgresql. As long the postgresql team will not endorse a replication solution, you can not expect people to put the same trust in these solutions as we put into postgresql itself." /Mikael ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
