* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Richard van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there a good reason that the official RPM on postgresql.org is not > > build with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP ? It would have been so nice if this > > would have worked. :-/ > > You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that > it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.
The default setting sucks. You're advocating a position which would
mean more work for our users (since they'd have to recompile their own
packages to achieve a sane setting). No thanks.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
