"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess I'm still somewhat puzzled by the original statement of the
> question, then. Why does that particular view of locks occasionally
> tie a SELECT to a granted Row Exclusive lock?
You sure it's not left over from an update command earlier in the
same transaction?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
