> >>>
> >>>Well this screams random arbitrary limit to me. Why does this limit
> >>>exist? What ever happened to the holy 0,1,infinity triumvirate?
> >>>
> >>
> >>I guess it eases implementation and there is no reason to go so high
> >>on columns either. The limit could even be lower w/o and hurts but
> >>1600 seems skyrocket high enough (read unlimited :-)

It is probably what fits in a single block.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org
  • ... Bruno Wolff III
    • ... Richard Huxton
    • ... John D. Burger
      • ... Jim C. Nasby
      • ... Evandro's mailing lists (Please, don't send personal messages to this address)
        • ... Tino Wildenhain
        • ... Chris Travers

Reply via email to