If there is a significant performance benefit to not expanding text columns in comparison operations, then it seems it should be OK.
I probably read the standard wrong, but it seems to me that varchar, char, and bpchar columns should all behave the same (e.g. if you do not expand with <blank> or the PAD character (whatever that is) then all char type columns should behave the same. I guess that there could be different default collations for different column types though (that is clearly allowed in the standard). Perhaps it just needs to be documented in such a way that even a blockhead like me can comprehend it easily. > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:06 PM > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Cc: Dann Corbit; Stephan Szabo; Terry Fielder; Tino Wildenhain; Marc G. > Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 'a' == 'a ' > > Dann, > > > I think that whatever is done ought to be whatever the standard says. > > If I misinterpret the standard and PostgreSQL is doing it right, then > > that is fine. It is just that PostgreSQL is very counter-intuitive > > compared to other database systems that I have used in this one > > particular area. When I read the standard, it looked to me like > > PostgreSQL was not performing correctly. It is not unlikely that I read > > it wrong. > > AFAIT, the standard says "implementation-specific". So we're standard. > > The main cost for comparing trimmed values is performance; factoring an > rtrim into every comparison will add significant overhead to the already > CPU-locked process of, for example, creating indexes. We're looking for > ways to make the comparison operators lighter-weight, not heavier. > > My general perspective on this is that if trailing blanks are a > significant > hazard for your application, then trim them on data input. That requires > a *lot* less peformance overhead than doing it every time you compare > something. > > Changing the behaviour would break backwards compatibility for some users. > For that matter, I've been subscribed to 8 PostgreSQL mailing lists since > 1999, and this is the first time I can recall someone complaining about > this comparison behavior. So it's obviously not a widespread issue. > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
