Andrew Sullivan wrote:

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:04:54PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
Out of curiosity, what is wrong with requiring client SSL certs to access the system and only issuing them to the PGPool system (or using a different CA if you need to issue client certs to the end users)? This

Hmm, I like this, although client SSL certs still didn't work with
JDBC last I checked, so it won't solve all the problems.  But you're
right, this would mostly solve the problem I was thinking of,
provided it was described correctly to the (mostly-clueless)
technology rule-producers.

Oops. I guess PgPool doesn't support SSL connections to backend servers. Too bad :-( This would have been a really nice elegant solution to this problem. It looks like PgCluster may support SSL, I am not sure.... The problem is that one needs some way of authenticating the client not just the user. SSL would work for that.

I can't think of any other way to authenticate the client while still allowing one to authenticate the user afterwards... And I doubt that it is possible to use Kerberos to authenticate the daemon as well as the end user...

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Travers
n:Travers;Chris
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to