Thanks. That syntax didn't look right to find values
gte 10000. But thanks everyone!
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all
> records
> > that contained x where x >= 10000
>
> Then flip it around:
>
> contain x where 10000 <= x
>
> 10000 <= ANY (array)
>
> For syntactic reasons, there's no "ANY(array) >= x"
> construct,
> so you have to write it this way.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
