[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) writes: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:21:31PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:07:47AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:47:26AM +0300, WireSpot wrote: >> > > But... will the resulting dump be consistent as far as foreign >> > > keys are concerned? Or will the current -t warning still apply >> > > (YMMV as to the consistency of the resulting dump)? >> > >> > I think the latter is better. This is solidly in the realm of >> > prying off cover plates, and the warning is already there :) >> >> I think it would be good to include an option that only does >> checking and doesn't actually try to dump anything. That would make >> it easier to ensure your config file is correct. > > Could you flesh this out a bit? What would this option produce in the > (imho most common) case where dependencies weren't all taken care of?
I'd think that throwing in the "-s" option would allow a meaningful dry run... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;; http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/languages.html Frisbeetarianism: The belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the roof and gets stuck... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
