Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/28/2005 2:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, there's the problem --- the stats subsystem is designed in a way
>> that makes it rewrite its entire stats collection on every update.
>> That's clearly not going to scale well to a large number of tables.
>> Offhand I don't see an easy solution ... Jan, any ideas?
> PostgreSQL itself doesn't work too well with tens of thousands of
> tables.
Really? AFAIK it should be pretty OK, assuming you are on a filesystem
that doesn't choke with tens of thousands of entries in a directory.
I think we should put down a TODO item to see if we can improve the
stats subsystem's performance in such cases.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
