Phil Endecott wrote: > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > > The integrated version > > of autovacuum that didn't make the cut before 8.0 avoids this problem > > since the autovacuum data is stored in the database. > > What is the status of this? Is it something that will be included in > 8.1 or 8.0.n? I might be able to patch the current code but that > doesn't seem like a useful thing to do if a better solution will arrive > eventually. I am currently running vacuums from a cron job and I think > I will be happy with that for the time being.
I will post about integrating pg_autovacuum into the backend for 8.1 in a few minutes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
