James Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said -- anyone stepping up to claiming using 'em? Are these things
> seen as against the data normalization grain?
One strike against 'em is the fairly high overhead involved --- a
composite value is stored as effectively its own tuple, so there's 28 or
so bytes of overhead for each one.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
