Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > To make libpq UTF-16 capable, we'd have to change its API for all > > strings; either make the strings counted rather than null-terminated, > > or make the string elements wchar instead of char. After that we'd > > have to hack the FE/BE protocol too (or more likely, require libpq > > to translate UTF-16 to UTF-8 before sending to the server). I don't > > foresee anyone doing any of this, at least not in the near term. > Is there any *real* loss of functionality in not supporting
> UTF-16 ? If so *should* it be supported in, say, 9.0 ? If not, > should there be a FAQ item saying why not ? Is there a reason you have to use UTF16? Can't you convert to UTF8 on input? (I have no idea myself.) Do other databases support both UTf8 and UTF16? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
