Dave
Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Are we interested in having plPHP in core?
Is there a reason why it can no longer operate as a standalone language out of pgfoundry, like pl/java and pl/perl?
PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
(Ask Joe Conway about PL/R. Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either. And pl/perl
*is* in core.)
I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing problems I think this is something to pursue.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
