Jason Tesser wrote:
1. i have a few funcions that depend on a type.  i don't want to have to srop 
every function just so I can drop the type and recreat everything.
Is there a better way to do this in Postgres?

Not really - if you're redefining the type then the functions really have to be recreated. I try to keep related objects in the same file, so I can re-run them all together.


2. The reason I had to create my own type was because record didn't ork for me when I was selecting data across multiple tables.
I thought it should be dynamic but it only seems to work if i select all data in one table. I need 2-3 columns from multiple
tables. Is there a better way to do this in Postgres?

Could you give more details of what you're trying? RECORD variables in functions should work fine.


--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to