On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:03:36PM -0600, Mike Nolan wrote: > > Slony-1 is perfectly capable of replicating to a slave database, > > then letting you decide to promote it to master, which is just > > what you'd need. Why are you asking about multi-master? > > I am concerned that if I have to support the traffic to keep the > slave unit in sync PLUS support general database use from the > 'slaved' office to the master one, on the same comm line, I might > start running into congestion issues.
Slony-1 does its level best to ship transactions in a compact way. Any write operations are done as the net result of the write transaction, not necessarily all the steps in between. IOW, don't worry too much :) > We will have people actively working the database in both office for > a period of several weeks to several months, depending on how the > final transfer plan unfolds. Sounds like a fit for Slony-1. Just make sure that nobody tries to write to a slave, as such writes will fail. > Master/Slave is probably an acceptable solution, I was just > wondering if there was a multi-master one available yet. Not really. If you *must* have multi-master, you probably have to get Oracle or DB2 and pay /mucho dinero/. Cheers, D -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
