Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Hmm - wonder if there might be some memory leak in updates to the R-tree
Yup, found one. The attached patch is against 7.4.
regards, tom lane
Index: rtree.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/rtree/rtree.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -c -r1.80 rtree.c
*** rtree.c 25 Sep 2003 06:57:57 -0000 1.80
--- rtree.c 24 Jan 2005 02:34:19 -0000
***************
*** 594,599 ****
--- 594,601 ----
rtup = (IndexTuple) index_formtuple(tupDesc,
&(v.spl_rdatum), isnull);
pfree(isnull);
+ pfree(DatumGetPointer(v.spl_ldatum));
+ pfree(DatumGetPointer(v.spl_rdatum));
/* set pointers to new child pages in the internal index tuples */
ItemPointerSet(&(ltup->t_tid), lbknum, 1);
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
