On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:19:10PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> > People have this weird notion that an index-based plan is always faster
> > than anything else.  If you like you can try the operation with "set
> > enable_seqscan = off", but I bet it will take longer.
> 
> Well, every other database I've used can do index covering, which means
> index scans *are* faster.

... on those database systems.  Indexes are different in Postgres in
general: they don't have visibility info (other systems don't need it,
tuples are always visible), and in some databases you have clustered
indexes, where the index is also the heap.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"We are who we choose to be", sang the goldfinch
when the sun is high (Sandman)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to