thanks for the advice,

matt


On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:47:08 +0100, Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> > due to the complicated nature of the database, and inability of zope
> 
>         Well, I've found that Zope is very good to do a few things, and very 
> bad
> at the rest.
> 
> > to do what we need, and the problems with overhead we've been
> > experiencing with rails due to the size of the database.  Hope this
> 
>         I like psycopy because selects with a lot of rows are processed
> efficiently.
> 
>         Look at the pydo library in the skunkweb project (google !)
> 
>         I'd advise you to start writing a base class for your database object
> (class DbObject) with a set of methods for setting instance methods from
> query results. SELECT * then use cursor.dictfetchall() which preserves the
> fields names !
>         Add methods for inserting and updating.
>         Add a mapping of fields to type converters (which are functions) to
> convert non-standard types like arrays to python lists if you need them.
> 
>         Then derive your DbObject class for each table, with class variables
> containing the field names and types converters, which will be used by the
> base class. This way you can have a derived class with almost no code.
> 
>         Enjoy !
>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to