Hi Tom, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: > "Joost Kraaijeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW even AS >> SELECT DISTINCT abo_his.klantnummer, > abo_his.artikelnummer, abo_his.code_retour, > abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt >> FROM abo_his >> JOIN abo_klt ON abo_his.klantnummer = abo_klt.klantnummer >> WHERE abo_his.abonnement = 238 >> ORDER BY abo_his.klantnummer, abo_his.artikelnummer, > abo_his.code_retour, abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt; > > Okay ... but the view is constraining abo_his.abonnement and > outputting abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen. Why would you assume that > joining on klantnummer would cause these two fields to necessarily be > the same?
In the table abo_klt there is no record where abo_klt.abonnement = 238 and abo_klt.afgewerkt > 0: munt=# select * from abo_klt where abonnement = 238 and afgewerkt > 0; ... (0 rows) So I assumed that in no join between abo_his (which has no "afgewerkt" column at all ) and abo_klt (which has 0 records with a "afgewerkt" columns > 0) as created above ( with WHERE abo_his.abonnement = 238) there could be a record with both abonnement = 238 and afgewerk >0. But there are: on the view there are : munt=# select * from even where afgewerkt > 0; ..... (797 rows) SO I must understand something wrong... Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly