IS this same issue true for hash or GiST indexes? On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 13:49, Dann Corbit wrote: > I suggest a warning (if there is not already one generated) on create > index for rtree indexes so that users know that they are not fully > supported. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:14 PM > To: Greg Stark > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt RTREE index > > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So you don't think this case is worth doing forensics on? > > If the problem goes away after REINDEX then I'll write it off as missing > WAL support. rtree is not high enough on my list of priorities to > justify more effort :-( > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
