On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:48:40 -0800,
Scott Frankel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1.
> CREATE TABLE names (the_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, the_name text);
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX uidx_thename ON names(the_name);
>
> vs.
>
> 2.
> CREATE TABLE names (the_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, the_name text UNIQUE);
>
>
> Is the UNIQUE constraint in the second solution merely short-hand for
> the explicit
> index declaration of the first solution? Or is there a functional
> difference between
> them that I should choose between?
Currently the only way to enforce a UNIQUE constraint is by using an index.
So there isn't really much difference between the two. However, I think
using the UNIQUE constraint provides better meaning than using an index
for people who might look at your definitions later.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
