Jonathan Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that I don't want to spend a lot of time and memory 
> building such a query (in C).  I would like to know if there is a way to 
> take this huge chunk of data and get it into the database in a less 
> memory-intensive way.  I suppose I could use COPY to put the data into a 
> table with triggers that would do the checks on the data, but it seems 
> inelegant and I'd like to know if there's a better way.

Actually I'd say that is the elegant way.  SQL is fundamentally a
set-oriented (table-oriented) language, and forcing it to do things in
an array fashion is just misusing the tool.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to