Other people have answered, but I'd like to add:
It makes it much faster to fix bugs and improve features in the projects
outside of the source tree. If replication has a bug, you don't want to
wait for the next point release, you want a fix *now*. PostgreSQL is a
big project, and can't make new point releases every time a bug appears
in a small subsystem.
To make an analogy, imagine if you had to wait for a new release of your
operating system to fix a bug in an SSL library?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 20:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> Why is it that PostgreSQL chooses to have features like replication,
> fulltext indexing and GIS maintained by others outside of the sourcetree?
>
> I appreciate any answers.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
