> Given that they have improved their SysV IPC support steadily over the > past few Darwin releases, I don't see why you'd expect them to not be > willing to do this. Having a larger default limit costs them *zero* if > the feature is not used, so what's the objection?
The objection would be attitudinal. I detect a whiff of "that's sooo obsolete, you should get with the program and do it our way instead" in their docs... -- Scott Ribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.killerbytes.com/ (303) 665-7007 voice ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
