Quoth John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As per subject, i'm considering migrating a database (still in > development) from MaxDB to postgresql. The main reason for this is > that the stored procedures (functions) in MaxDB are unreliable and > hard to debug, and that the JDBC driver is still experimental. > > I thought I'd post here to find out how well functions and JDBC are > supported in postgresql. > > If anyone has info or experience on these two things, I'd be > interested to see what your opinion is.
Some internal "hackery" has occasionally taken place with JDBC drivers that have caused internal consternation (basically due to developers needing some new features that were in the "beta" JDBC code), although that seems to be fading with 7.4. And if you don't hack on the drivers, you won't get bitten by that sort of thing :-). The fact that there are easily multiple levels of quoting in stored functions certainly makes debugging a bit of a pain, but unreliability is not one of the problems observed. For instance, the Slony-I replication system <http://slony.info/> has a considerable portion of its code that consists of pl/pgsql stored functions, and it would break with great horribleness if stored functions were at all "flakey." -- "cbbrowne","@","linuxfinances.info" http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/ Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they AREN'T after you. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster