NOTE: The first way cannot support OUTER joins, the second way can. Hence sometimes one has to use the second way for at least some of the joins.
PREVIOUSLY: The second way can allow one to tell the planner a "better way" to join the tables. Likewise it can also enable the programmer to force the planner into a worse way. Oops! NOW: I believe that the latest version of postgres (7.4.x) the planner will override the 2nd methods requested join method if it knows of a better way and can do the better way. (Outer joins need to be done last, by the nature of them, and so cannot be changed much, there may be other cases where the planner cannot change the requested plan). I am not an expert, but this is what I recall from following the list. Terry Fielder Manager Software Development and Deployment Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (416) 441-9085 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Russ Brown > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [GENERAL] Join efficiency > > > Hello all, > > Recently a post on this list made me think a bit about the > way in which I > write my queries. > > I have always written queries with ordinary joins in this manner: > > SELECT * FROM a, b WHERE a.x=b.x; > > However I recently saw an laternative syntax: > > SELECT * FROM a JOIN b ON a.x=b.x; > > Is there any difference between these queries in terms of the > speed of > planning or the quality of the plan untimately used? I'd > imagine that the > second form provides more information that the planner may be > able to use > to make a better plan (or make a good plan more easily), but > I've never > had any problems with the first form. > > It also seems to me that the second form is more > self-documenting, which > is something I'm always in favour of. > > I'd appreciate anyone's thought/insight. > > Thanks. > > -- > > Russell Brown > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index > scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
