With mem per CPU, Opterons scale very well in most cases (as long as you have many processes). The lower memory latency helps too.

Is it likely for you to be network bandwidth limited - e.g. maxing out your NICs or NIC I/O capacity? I doubt it, but if you are actually getting close then things get a bit harder...

BTW in most Opteron configs, a lot of the major I/O goes through via one CPU.

Check this out:
http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000277

The benchmarks could be interesting too.

At 05:06 PM 3/8/2004 -0700, Steve Wolfe wrote:

  The main question in my mind is whether a 4-way Opteron is going to
give me enough of a performance benefit over a 2-way Opteron to make the
extra $10k worth it.  My first guess was that it would, as going from 2
Opterons to 4 will give you twice the potential memory bandwidth.
However, as PostgreSQL pulls heavily from the global buffers, I may not be
able to utilize all of that potential bandwidth.

  If anyone has done tests with PostgreSQL on 2- vs. 4-way machines under
heavy load (many simultaneous connections), I would greatly appreciate
hearing about the results.

Steve Wolfe


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
     subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
     message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to